![]() |
William Tarr (b.2/21/1808 ~ d.7/10/1891)
At this time I would like to highlight the Manchester maker William Tarr. Although we have talked about him on occasion I feel that now is a good time to put this maker in the spotlight.
I posted a few days ago on the English Basses general thread about 'a whopper landed'. Quote:
Now that I have had this bass here a few days I have discovered a few things between the instrument itself and reading up on the maker W.Tarr. First off, depending on which Violin Books you have or have read you might or might not get his correct dates. The books with the correct dates are all out of print now. These are books by George Hart, W.M. Morris and Jalovec. It seems there are some incorrect dates in Henley, Plowright and Harvey. One book has him making his first bass in 1834 but Hart has him listed as 'by' 1829 (at 21 yrs old). That is the supposed date of this bass. In Elgar, a bass-only book he mentions that Tarr made both Viol and Violin models of which Elgar claimed to prefer the Viol. Maybe it was the size because of the two violin models I have seen now (1 pictured) and one other I have heard about, they are all full 4/4 model basses. The Viol model seems to be more of a full 3/4 or 7/8ths sized model as we call them today. This particular bass I have here (#8 from 1829) is basically all original in its parts from what I can see. It was cut down about 52 years ago and the back shows purfling only in the c-bout area. On the top, the purfling was replaced in both bouts with similar looking material but not exact looking with a magnifier. Now, looking inside the Back which is well oxidized in color and in fantastic shape as well I see that there are no cross braces in the bouts other then the center brace and the angle bend. Also, there are no scars or discolorations of this Back ever having braces there either. Maybe this accounts for the near mint condition of the Back.I do notice however that the center and outer flank joints have been re-glued at least once in some spots so maybe that's a sign of where the movement occurred. Also, this Bass has lived in the same UK climate all of its life up until 5 days ago when it was brought over to the States. I know of a few other players that have Tarr basses in the Viol model and they seem well loved, all professional Classical/Orchestral players. So, this is now the official place for discussions on Basses by Tarr who was also assisted at times by his sons Thomas, Joesph and Shelly. There were also at least two other makers of note that worked for Tarr and they include Cole and Briggs. Like in the case of Prescott being the most prolific Yankee bass maker, Tarr is the head of the Manchester bass makers as well. Welcome to the official Tarr School on-line discussion thread. |
Halle Tarr pics.. (Temps)
6 Attachment(s)
Here are a few pics we just took of the Bass but not the Pics we will use for the web page. Just a quick preview using our email camera skills.;)
|
Gorgeous bass!
|
nice bass!
|
WOW! I never seen a bass so big!
even the bigger ones I've seen don't come close to that one! I wonder what it feels like playing that beast. Can't even imagine what it sounds like! |
yup..
It's a beast but very playable. If not for the lack of a C-Extension presently I would use it next week on my Concert. I will be bringing it up to Arnold shortly for some set-up tweaks and possible a C-Extension to make it Orchestra ready, American style.
|
Quote:
http://www.thomasmartin.co.uk/sale_w...ouble_bass.asp :eek: |
Man, these basses look amazing. I would love to give one a whirl one of these days.
So, my question is, why are they getting smaller? They all seem to have been cut down. What has changed since they were made that everyone reduces them in size? |
Quote:
|
this one?
Quote:
The Slant of the FFs' looks more Briggs and nothing like Tarr but slightly Cole but not. The Scroll is more like Briggs as well. The Gears are Tarr style but that is more than likely what was available then up there in Manchester. I have seen this on Martin's restoration page as well and yes, I am glad it's not mine. I would not buy something like this across the pond unless it was to die for and affordable or under market, whatever that price would be! |
Quote:
|
getting smaller?
Quote:
Playing the Orchestra music on a big bass is also not as much 'fun' these days as the demand is quite high. Economically, most your professionals shopping for a new bass to get 'that' orchestra gig wants the same bass to play both excerpts and solo on. Prices of these classics today also make it harder to own more than one expensive bass as well. The most desirable basses today are those with 'the sound' and easy to play. Many players that have played on 4/4 type basses for decades look forward to down sizing in measurements but not sound. Those players however that have landed a good steady job in a section are also trying to keep up with these powerful organ tones biggies so they sometimes in the aftermath, shop for that big monster that no one will mess with. In the higher priced basses I have sold as many or more bigger basses than 3/4 or modified style 7/8ths over time. The bigger ones usually, but not always has that extra floor shaking quality that impresses all the players around you. This includes the podium, violins and brass as well. I have received complements from across the stage many times. Hardly ever though with a smaller bass in hand. |
sounds like..
Quote:
The sound is thick and organ like but sweet on top, not dry at all. It also sounds old and relaxed. My Panormo is similar but not as 'wet' in the sound. Both are silky though but describing sound is like describing taste. Not so easy as we all perceive things individually. The Tarr to my ears has more of a melodic Italian tone across the full range of the bass. The Panormo is maybe more floor shaking and sweeter on top but dryer in the middle. The flat back of the Tarr along with its slightly reduced size feels to me easier to play and get around than the Panormo mainly because I am more of a 3/4-7/8ths player than a 4/4 huger. The slightly wider bouts don't seem to be a problem either considering its size as compared to the 4/4 Panormo which was also slightly reduced at the Block and in its length. Still, if left with only one bass to play, I would welcome either the Panormo or Tarr with open arms. Opened a bit wider than usual..lol ;) |
Halle Tarr Tailpiece
2 Attachment(s)
I just received the Tailpiece that was taken off the Tarr when converted back to 4-string from the previous 5-string modification. There is an extra smaller hold drilled for the A string that is just under the Brass inlay.
There is a lower brass circle with mother of pearl inlay at the bottom still intact plus an empty cutout from a missing crest at the top plus a center inlay partially filled in. I would love to know what was in there. Always a mystery..;) |
Interesting about the lack of internal back braces. In a Lott bass I have been studying here, the cross braces (apart from the centre brace) are only about 1cm tall and wide. The back's in reasonable condition. Perhaps cross bracing isn't as necessary as we think? Certainly won't keep a centre seam together if it wants to open up. When i think about it, the main reason i'm putting braces in my current build is to give the flat back a bit of convex "shape".
|
Quote:
Can we see that Lott? Are those the original braces in there? |
Not great photos I'm afraid:
Lott: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5062/...df5c9f12df.jpg bracing at the break: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5230/...bd027a7f9c.jpg And in the lower bout. Looks original to me, but I didn't open up the bass to look closely. http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5188/...009347825c.jpg Perhaps the bracing is a little bigger than 1cm but I was surprised when I looked inside how insubstantial it all looked. http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5222/...c9cae2d79e.jpg Whitehead extension: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/...28f127687e.jpg http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5021/...4872128e40.jpg |
Tarr..
Back on the Tarr subject, I just brought it home last night from Arnold's with its new chromatic C-Extension, beautifully made and mounted if I may add. With the Season just about over, I might try it on one of the summer concerts and see how I get around it. I just have to do a few personal tweaks with the set-up, as usual.;)
As soon as I can get my son Mike to take some pics and get the page up, I will fill in its data and have it posted on line. This particular Tarr is a piece of British history. |
Custom Gears..
2 Attachment(s)
In doing the C-Extension the Plates and Gears were removed from the Bass. The Plates have fused housings for the Gear shafts to slide in to. One Gear might be an old replacement but the one with the milled shaft was done to put a fifth gear around the shaft inside the pegbox as the bass was used as a 5-sting for quite some time and then recently converted back to 4-string.
My Panormo School was also a 5er at one point modified with a 5th gear at the TP and the ball end of the string anchored in the pegbox. I have also seen two old 3-string basses modified to 4-strings that way as well. One was a Prescott and one a beautiful Goffriller that I tried to buy when I was younger. Both those bass had their original 3-gears in the pegbox. The Panormo still retains its original plates and the 3 original Baker gears, with a 4th one added later, not quite matching 100% but close enough. The original center hole in the plates from its 3-string days is still visible under the gears. I just thought it would be interesting for historical purposes to show that while Baker gears (and a few others in his time) flourished in London, the Manchester school up north headed by Tarr had their own metal works of art. Side by side, the Tarr gears win as the most beautiful I have seen combined with their plates. Note: Pictures courtesy of Arnold Schnitzer. |
ok..
Here is the new Page on the Tarr. The pics were done against a wall and not the usual mahogany door and with flash. The pics came out quite dark but the bass is dark as well. We might in the near future re-take the pics in attempt to get some more light on them.
http://www.kensmithbasses.com/doublebasses/tarr/ |
My 2 cents
I like your original bass display background MUCH better. It's a signature look and the pics come off far more professionally. In any case, beautiful basses, as always. :)
|
signed inside...
When I got the Bass I was given pictures of some facsimile Labels that were lost in a previous restoration but photographed. I was told that the 2 of the 1829 was not all that clear but they would go with it as No. 8 would be very early in his making. I thought they meant the other label that the facsimile replaced prior to the restoration.
I took the group of the repairs and makers facsimile labels and made one label from that picture to put inside the Bass so the history doesn't get lost and glued it to the center Back brace. When I was about to remove my light from the opposite F-hole I took one last look inside and then.. Holy Sxxt.. The real original inscription in William Tarr's old English calligraphy writing in heavy ink was there. Around the inscription was a faint line as if tape was placed over it for the last Back Restoration or when the Bass was cut down 1959. So, this Tarr IS labeled, handwritten into wood of the upper Back just below the angle bend on the bass side opposite the Bass Bar of the Top. This is what they were talking about as far as the trouble in reading some of the numbers. Why can't those Brit's speak clear English? :( Wait, that IS English, lol :D I Speak American..:eek: .. ;) .. :cool: |
wow, can you make a picture?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe I can sell that door on Ebay some day..:D |
Quote:
|
update (if anyone cares.. lol)
Quote:
|
Nice idea. Thanks for sharing your process...it is quite interesting to watch it all unfold.
|
Page up, pics fixed..
Ok, we just published the Page and lightened up the pics a bit. Enjoy..
http://www.kensmithbasses.com/doublebasses/high.html http://www.kensmithbasses.com/doublebasses/tarr/ |
This bass sounds like a whole section by itself. I still can't get over how deep it sounds!
Nice pics! Brian |
Quote:
|
Maiden Concert..
Tonight, I took out the Tarr and played it in a Concert, cold! Cold, meaning I did 2 rehearsals with the Hart and one with the Uebel (to test it out) and after the dress rehearsal last night, decided to take the Tarr and just wing it on stage. We did this program; http://www.buckscountysymphony.org/e...ALL-CONCERT-29
The Violin soloist played on a Strad. What can I do, bring less than my best on the 8th stand?:confused: The Tarr by the way was shaking the stage and was easily heard over the other 7 basses in the loudest FFF sections. On some of the PPP parts, I couldn't play soft enough. The Bass was ultra smooth and very thick sounding as well as clear as a bell. About the best in tone and power I have heard in a long time. It's BIG, but manageable, more than you would think by looking at it! :cool: This was by the way the first time the Tarr was ever played live in USA, ever, since its birth in 1829. Maybe it worked out so good because it already knows English.. ;) |
Sounds like quite an evening.
Very beautiful bass. I'd love to hear this one... |
Your Tarr does indeed look wonderful Ken and I'm sure it sounds equally great. It makes me wonder, though, about the nationality of basses and their uses in different countries. Most professionals here in the UK prefer English basses and if you don't have one, it can be very difficult getting work as other instruments tend not to blend into the section as well. You say that your Tarr could be heard above the rest of your bass section. Isn't this a bit of a problem rather than an advantage?
|
blend..
Quote:
I don't see it as a advantage or a problem but rather a test run of what the bass could do. It was the first time the bass was ever played in USA in the few months it's been here. With the smooth low end depth-spread and clear deep bell tone mids I felt the bass could be played from pppp to ffff without much effort at all. One of the guys trying it on stage mentioned how easy the power came out when playing it. Also, aren't there a few good Italians and old German basses in use in the UK? How about Hawkes basses? Aren't most of them German made on a modified English Panormo pattern? Yes, English basses are great section basses but, if you are the only one with a $100k class bass can't you just enjoy the thunder? :cool: |
Get your point Ken. As for other basses used in the UK - Hawkes basses are certainly expensive now, but still not really regarded as suitable for the best professional sections. Hardly any German basses are played professionally in the UK but, of course, there are some amazing old Italian instruments in use. Then it comes back to who actually made these instruments. I was playing with a guy last year who had a beautiful old Italian bass. I asked him if he knew who made it to which he replied "No, but I'll make up a name if I ever sell it". I'm sure this is the case with most of the Italians! The number of "Amati" basses seems to increase daily.
|
"Number of Amati's", lol.
Quote:
|
Just can't stop looking at this bass. It is just so beautiful...
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)