Thread: Roebuck Bass?
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 07-05-2007, 03:54 AM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,852
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Cool

Both Arnold and myself have a lot of experience with these kind of Basses. He has repaired and restored many of them as well as play every Bass that goes thru the shop. I have owned several Basses that were born as Blockless but were blocked when I got them. I have also played a few of them owned by other players that were still Blockless. One Bass I bought in 1975 had the raised neck block but had a block already. Some of these Basses may also have an integral Bassbar as I did shave one out of that Bass and put a Bar in it when I did the restoration on it which was one of the few I did way back when.

These Basses being at least 100 years old on average or older can sound good. Most have thin tops. Mine was a large/long 7/8ths labeled Sebastian Klotz, 1791. Was it a Klotz? I doubt it but it sounded great before I took off the top. I never played it again as it was sold just before completion to another Bassist/Repairer who was looking for a projects and he took two such Basses off my hands at that time.

My Batchelder Bass also seems to have been made Blockless as well. I mentioned the Klotz in my previous post but not the Batchelder. In either case, you can see the Batchelder here to get an idea of what I am talking about. It has a Block and Bassbar now but due to its type of Back Construction (half mortise) it is not fully lined. This is a job Arnold may do if his bench clears up and it doesn't get sold in the mean time. It is 100% healthy at the moment but tightening up the insides (which seem to have been repaired by many people), will most likely improve the already good tone it has.
Reply With Quote