Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Double Basses > Luthier's Corner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2009, 10:02 AM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Matthew Tucker Matthew Tucker is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-19-2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 427
Matthew Tucker is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Default

I don't see why I would have created a fault line? The bar is still set at a slight angle to the top grain. If I'd finished the regrad at a sharp line parallel to the top grain, maybe. But the stresses are still distributed exactly the same as they were before, because the bass bar is in the same spot. The top is just slightly thinner, and a little thicker immediately under the bar.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2009, 11:07 AM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,863
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Cool but..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Tucker View Post
I don't see why I would have created a fault line? The bar is still set at a slight angle to the top grain. If I'd finished the regrad at a sharp line parallel to the top grain, maybe. But the stresses are still distributed exactly the same as they were before, because the bass bar is in the same spot. The top is just slightly thinner, and a little thicker immediately under the bar.
I think Arnold means that if the platform is at a right angle 90 degrees with the Bar directly under it, sitting on it, it acts as a pressure point along the edges or the 'bar joint. I think that is what he is referring to rather than a gentle sloped platform in which the 'bar would sit. That's how the Gilkes is done. You can feel it but you can't see it that easily. It is slight but it is there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2009, 04:02 PM
Arnold Schnitzer Arnold Schnitzer is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-22-2007
Location: Putnam County, NY
Posts: 453
Arnold Schnitzer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Tucker View Post
I don't see why I would have created a fault line? The bar is still set at a slight angle to the top grain. If I'd finished the regrad at a sharp line parallel to the top grain, maybe. But the stresses are still distributed exactly the same as they were before, because the bass bar is in the same spot. The top is just slightly thinner, and a little thicker immediately under the bar.
Yes, I see your point. I was thinking the cut-out under the bar was following the grain, but this is not really so. Anecdotally, though, I have seen a bass where the regrad was done this way and the top cracked badly. I remember it being pretty thin. And the wall of old top wood on which the bar sat was a good 4-5mm high.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2009, 05:16 PM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Matthew Tucker Matthew Tucker is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-19-2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 427
Matthew Tucker is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Default

I've taken off from 1mm going to 2mm at the tips. I'm not worried structurally, but as I said, I don't think I'd do it again that way. And your words of caution are duly noted!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)