![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken, thanks for the invite to measure the Reccardi bass I may take you up on that someday. I also do want to play and hear it!
We are going to have to see how this one turns out and it will be a lesson to us all I think. Keep in mind that my lower bout is very wide at 28+ inches making the upper bout look small. It will be 18 inches, which is still smaller than the Storioni by about 2 inches, but not as much as the Lemur bass which is 15 1/2 (anyone know how that one sounds?) and the Bass attributed to Ruggeri (Sciachia's), is also 18. The way I arch and graduate the stiffness of the top, along with the bridge height (downward pressure) is going to have a big effect. I also think that your string length (mensure) goes a long way in defining the huge sound! I have heard this from other experts. So keep the comments coming, every morsel is gold and a learning experience for me. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its a better shape, but to my taste, the lower bout still looks odd, I'd let the bottom block spring out a bit so the bottom isn't so flat. otherwise it gives the impression of weight squashing down. I don't mind the small upper bout but the lower bout looks too squished. A little more curve in that area will give that lower lower bout area a bit more structural strength too.
I agree with your opinion that the 44" string length of Kens bass is likely to be a BIG factor in its great sound as well. That does not diminish its other qualities, of course. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay Matthew I am going to play with that a bit and see what I come up with.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have put wood under the string and experimented with 42" and there was not much loss of sound. It tightened up a bit but this has so much bottom, no one will miss the difference.
I don't think Ruggeri or Roggeri would make a Bass that looks so primitive. These guys were some of the neatest makers ever. i think sometimes people pull names out of a hat to make the Bass something it is not. On mine being a Storioni, it is only attributed to that name and I am equally doubtful it is his work. The upper bout is crucial in the tone and depth of the Bass as is the middle bout. The middle bout has to reach the limit to where bowing is comfortable but the more you give it, the wider and deeper the sound will be. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am sure you are right about the width issues also. Have another look, I took Matthew's suggestion. http://www.upnorthstrings.com/cornerlessbasspage4.html Looks better doesn't it. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes, I see his idea there. The whole thing must be in harmony including the graduations, Arch and wood species. Why does one Bass sound better than another? Why can't they make it just as good each time? Does the words 'luck' and educated guess' mean anything? Yes, I think so but to what degree, THAT is the question..lol |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah better! Imagine the bottom bracket is the bumcrack
... much more shapely now! LOL! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|