![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Remember, You can't hold no groove if you ain't got no pocket! ![]() Last edited by Tim Murphy; 12-01-2009 at 10:02 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Being that the sound comes mainly from the Top in my experience and the core flavors the Top's sound I would have to say it would add a little edge that the Walnut usually has rather than adding spread which the Maple would do.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks Ken, So, would you say the W/W/W would be a more "aggressive" toned bass than the W/M/W? Mainly I play Urban Gospel and Smooth Jazz.
__________________
Remember, You can't hold no groove if you ain't got no pocket! ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I would say so but the difference is subtle.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks Ken this has helped me out considerably.
__________________
Remember, You can't hold no groove if you ain't got no pocket! ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I say get a brighter sounding wood bass...
always better to roll off treble then try adding it...
__________________
Thump_ |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|