Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Double Basses > Luthier's Corner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2010, 06:15 PM
Nathan Parker Nathan Parker is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-20-2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 34
Nathan Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

It does look cool, that is for sure. So, ideally, would all the sand be symmetrical? I see that it mostly is, except at one frequency were there is a slight variance. It is pretty incredible the different patterns it forms based on frequency of vibration. How consistent are the results? If you were to do the same test back to back, are the results identical?

Sorry for all the questions, just very curious.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2010, 07:39 PM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Matthew Tucker Matthew Tucker is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-19-2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 427
Matthew Tucker is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Default

yes same tests back to back are identical if nothing else changes. I suppose if you take the view that symmetrical plates are ideal or necessary (although there's no evidence that this is the case) then symmetrical shapes would indicate this.

My ideal is to get the tea-leaf patterns looking as much like Yosemite Sam as possible. Yosemite Sam is the holy grail of chladni enthusiasts ... I have a long way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2010, 08:53 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,863
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Default Yosemite Sam??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Tucker View Post
yes same tests back to back are identical if nothing else changes. I suppose if you take the view that symmetrical plates are ideal or necessary (although there's no evidence that this is the case) then symmetrical shapes would indicate this.

My ideal is to get the tea-leaf patterns looking as much like Yosemite Sam as possible. Yosemite Sam is the holy grail of chladni enthusiasts ... I have a long way to go.
If you get what you call Yosemite Sam, what does that mean? Is this something a maker shoots for or an accident hoping to happen?

Doesn't that top need some cleats for all the cracks you glued up so far? How will Sam react to that?

Have fun..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2010, 10:35 PM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Matthew Tucker Matthew Tucker is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-19-2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 427
Matthew Tucker is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Default

Yosemite Sam is just me being silly, Ken. For me it is JUST another measure of the top and doesn't really give any more clues about what must be done than does the distance between the FFs or the size of the endpin block or the width of the lower bout. Since I have the bass top off I can make these measurements and see what happens when i remove wood where I think it needs to be removed. I'll also be able to compare what happens when I cleat the cracks, and when I add the new bass bar.

The patterns are cool but are only a flag to show that the particular resonance mode has been met. I don't know enough about the shape to be able to draw any conclusions. And there are too many variables ... such as the arching shape for starters. The most interesting number I think is the frequency of vibration which combined with the weight of the plate is a measure of stiffness. If, after I do everything and re-cleat and replace the bass bar, the modes appear at the same frequencies, I can - I think - assume that the plate is fairly consistent with how it started out. If on the other hand, the frequencies are lower, but the weight is the same, this will show me that what I have done has increased the flexibility of the plate. I can make those sorts of observations.

I could - and will - also flex the plates with my fingers, tap them etc - and you DO get a lot of tactile feedback when you are working on the plates with the planes and scrapers. But this is more subjective.

Nothing here, unfortunately, will tell me whether I've done enough ... or gone too far!

See where I'm coming from? I'm not looking for a magic pill; it would be nice in a way if we could ****yse this work scientifically but I don't think this is at all easy - at the end of the day a luthier's work a series of educated hunches and generalisations. Some people might think that this sort of mucking around is a waste of time but for me, the more information I have to inform my instincts, the better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2010, 05:45 AM
Thomas Erickson's Avatar
Thomas Erickson Thomas Erickson is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 05-23-2010
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 309
Thomas Erickson is on a distinguished road
Default

I wonder if there is a comparable system for testing resonance of a plate on a complete instrument. Seems like testing the plate on its own, then as part of the complete assembly, and finally under tension would give a lot of insight that could be applied not only that instrument but to making new ones and improving older ones.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2010, 05:50 AM
Craig Regan Craig Regan is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 06-29-2008
Location: Pompey NY
Posts: 110
Craig Regan is on a distinguished road
Default

So... Is the plan to re graduate, then put the bass bar and cleats back in? Or is it a combination of installing and graduating as you go?

Also... how do you keep from losing your crack locations?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2010, 06:04 AM
Thomas Erickson's Avatar
Thomas Erickson Thomas Erickson is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 05-23-2010
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 309
Thomas Erickson is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Regan View Post
So... Is the plan to re graduate, then put the bass bar and cleats back in? Or is it a combination of installing and graduating as you go?

Also... how do you keep from losing your crack locations?
You can't really remove wood from under the bass bar or cleats...

I think he said further up the thread that he uses a grease pencil or something to mark out the cracks...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2010, 07:46 AM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Matthew Tucker Matthew Tucker is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-19-2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 427
Matthew Tucker is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Default

The procedure is to get the top thicknesses right first, then add the bass bar and cleats. It's much easier to track the cracks now that the surface is mostly clean wood.

Thomas here are SOOO many variables I really don't think anyone could live long enough to repeat what Carleen Hutchins did in her lifetime and come up with something new. I think that measuring the resonance of a free plate is a completely different thing to measuring an assembled instrument - no comparisons can be made because they are two different things. It would not be hard to measure an assembled instrument I suppose, but then it would be very complicated to make any adjustments. I'm not about to go there!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)