#1
|
||||
|
||||
Hotter signal?
I have an '87 BT5, 3 knobber with lots of miles on it. It plays like a Smith should, all 'buttery' and such. It's made a better player out of me and I love it. Finger runs, slapping and tapping are a breeze but I want a hotter, more 'responsive to touch' kind of signal. Could this be age- related electronics and/or pickups? Any suggestions?
Last edited by Jim Gorman; 12-04-2008 at 06:13 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
humm?
Quote:
The guys playing with these basses for 20 years and making a living doing so have never asked for anything volume wise. I guess they do that on the amp or in the board in the studio. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Hmmm, need some clarity.
Need some clarity. Unless I am misunderstanding you here Ken, I did not know you made a 'passive' bass . You stated above "The Circuit has bs/tr controls only, not separate active volume boost". Did you make any or many basses without the 'active' circuit or were there just a select few and which models (if model specific)?
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Ahh..
Quote:
The active by-pass (push/pull volume) can only work if the volume control and the pickups are passive. The Balance control are basically the pickup mix control and passive as well. When you lift the volume knob, everything still works but the tone +/- controls (bs/md/tr). This is why the Bass will work when the batteries go dead. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
.....
I understand the p/u's, passive/active circuit, controls, etc. used in your basses. What I did not know was that you made basses without the active circuit. So, in Jim's case, he has a bass that does not have the active circuit, correct? If yes, trying to explain to him that he could adjust the 'gain trim pot' would be a waste of time.
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Question
Quote:
Also, whether the bass is active or passive, I would suggest to ensure your strings are fresh (I would use Smith TCRM's), set-up is correct for you, then adjust your individual string pole pieces on each p/u such that you are getting the maximum pull from the p/u's without getting distortion. If you are not sure how to do this, find someone who is. It's not hard, you just need to know what you are doing. Or, send it in to Ken and have him look at it for you.
__________________
Tim Bishop Last edited by Tim Bishop; 12-02-2008 at 11:54 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
'86 bt5
The 1986 BTs had an Active 2-band concentric bs/tr circuit. No mid, no trim pot. Nothing to adjust other than to have the bass in its best possible condition.
We had also made some passive Basses from 1980 to '86 or so with a passive circuit, no battery in side. We made these in both NY and PA. Most were made in NY. These had one large knob and two small ones and one or two switches. Stand-by at the end and Phase in the middle. Some might be without the phase and some might not have a switch at all. I can't remember all the versions. The Stand-by was great for doublers, putting the Smith down to play the upright bass with out touching any controls and leaving it plugged in, no battery to drain. Unless I see the Bass in question, I am at a loss to comment further in this particular Bass. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
oops..
The Bass is pictured with him playing it.. My Bad.. That is the BT concentric..
Never mind... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Not to derail this thread, but i was just going to comment.
I had a '85 BT4 set neck with the passive set up. That standby was very cool indeed. Even the phase was useful as an effect, with the blend rolled off center. At times i wish i could have kept it, but i really wanted a 5 and active so i traded for a BSR5 that i love more every day. One note that suprises me is that the BSR 5 set flat sounds very similar to the BT 4 even though one is active and one is passive. Bill
__________________
______________________________________ http://www.myspace.com/hayfireband http://www.myspace.com/BILLBERNHARDBASS |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
.....
That's because when you have your BSR5 set flat, you're not really using the benefits of the active circuit. So, what you are stating would stand to reason. Good observation though.
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks to all...
Thanks for the responses, everyone. I should also state that I play with a high 'C' rather the a low 'B'. Like I said, I've got a lot of playing time on this bass. I am enclosing some close-up shots that might help tell my story better.
P.S. It's an'87 BT5, sorry for the mistake. Thanks again, Jim |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Man you weren't kidding when you said that bass has had some miles put on it.. Have you had it since new? There's a lot of blood, sweat, and tears in that finish!
__________________
Proud original owner of a 2001 Ken Smith BSR4EG lined fretless. My band's site: Delusional Mind |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Let it Snow, let it Snow..
Quote:
Ahh... The Snow Flake years... I remember them well.. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Let it snow....
Oh the weather outside is frightful,
But my Smith is so delightful, And since we've no place to go, Play it Bro! Play it Bro! Play it Bro!... Ah yes, lol, I am bored....
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Snowflakes - returning?
Any Chance those snowflakes can return in the 30th Anniversary Model?
__________________
-- Christopher Rhodes www.crjazz.com chris-rhodes@comcast.net http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtLy4wtJy4k |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
30th?
June 2009: Doesn't look like there's going to be a 30th. Ann. Model. Ken?
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
30th?
I think the 25th says it all for the moment. If I think of something, I will let you all know..
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, it does....
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
30th Anniversary?
Ken,
I remember there was a 20th anniversary model in 1999, and then there was a 25th Anniversary model; so maybe there might be a 30th anniversary model?
__________________
-- Christopher Rhodes www.crjazz.com chris-rhodes@comcast.net http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtLy4wtJy4k |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|