Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Electric Basses > Woods, Electronics, & Components

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2012, 01:53 PM
Desmund Nichols Desmund Nichols is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-20-2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 151
Desmund Nichols is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Desmund Nichols
Default Reverse 2/3 gears

Just curious, is there a reason for the reverse 2/3 gears on the 5 string?
__________________
Des
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2012, 02:20 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,851
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Cool Possibly

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desmund Nichols View Post
Just curious, is there a reason for the reverse 2/3 gears on the 5 string?
Desmund, in my opinion and experience, lengthening the lower strings after-lengths slightly changes the tension of the strings. This will also change how it feels in your hands and affect the sound as well. The differences might be slight but I do feel it makes a difference. If you like, reverse your E and B strings and see what happens.

When I first started working on basses before I had my company I was putting 'Badass' bridges on old Fenders. Those bridges are longer than the Fender bridges so tp utilize that extra length, I would re-drill the bridge screw anchor holes back about 3/8" across, the maximum, before the back of the bridge would hang over the round-over of the body. By doing this (and I did try that bridge in the original holes before), the bass felt smoother and better.

In the 19th century, many French double bass makers would reverse the tuners putting the E and A higher than the G and D. Usually the E was lowest and then the G alternating side to side. Some German makers in Saxony followed this as well to lengthen the E from a sharper bend than necessary.

It is believed by some (not all), that the after lengths have something to do with the tension, feel and sound. Look at the Cabling of a Suspension Bridge (the ones you drive over), note how the cables are anchored and bent downwards at the end. I can guarantee you that they just didn't do those angles and lengths by chance. There is engineering behind it. The same should apply to making basses, to get the optimum support and function out of everything that thought goes into when designing a product.

OR, I just felt like doing it because it looks cool or different!

It's your choice to decide if there is anything behind it or the theory to do so.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-29-2012, 12:13 AM
Joshua Phelps's Avatar
Joshua Phelps Joshua Phelps is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 09-16-2012
Location: m
Posts: 76
Joshua Phelps is on a distinguished road
Default 2 over 3

They Look Nice too! Cant Wait to get My New 5er with 2 over 3

Last edited by Joshua Phelps; 10-29-2012 at 12:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-29-2012, 10:21 AM
Desmund Nichols Desmund Nichols is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-20-2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 151
Desmund Nichols is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Desmund Nichols
Default

My 5er has 2 on top of 3.
__________________
Des
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-29-2012, 01:55 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,851
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Cool 2/3's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desmund Nichols View Post
My 5er has 2 on top of 3.
After nearly 30 years, the 2/3 gear layout works just as well. It does to some however make a difference with 3/2. We can make them either way but most these days want the 3/2.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-29-2012, 03:14 PM
Scott Pope Scott Pope is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-23-2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 79
Scott Pope is on a distinguished road
Default

Another reason I like the 2(B&E) + 3(ADG) arrangement is that because this usually puts the B tuner farther from the nut than any other arrangement, whether 3+2, 4+1, or even 5+0, there is more room for the B string leader, which for me allows the B string to be tuned more smoothly and precisely, and does not bind the string onto the tuner post getting into the taper of the leader into the speaking length of the string, or worse yet, onto the speaking length itself.

Ken, thanks for adopting the 2+3 as your standard tuner arrangement.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-29-2012, 05:53 PM
Joshua Phelps's Avatar
Joshua Phelps Joshua Phelps is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 09-16-2012
Location: m
Posts: 76
Joshua Phelps is on a distinguished road
Default ?

So more people request the 3 over 2 these days? I love the reverse 2 over 3
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-29-2012, 06:07 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,851
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Cool no

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Phelps View Post
So more people request the 3 over 2 these days? I love the reverse 2 over 3
We make the basses 2/3, 2 on the bass side. Maybe once every few years, we get a request for the old way, 3/2.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-29-2012, 11:20 PM
Joshua Phelps's Avatar
Joshua Phelps Joshua Phelps is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 09-16-2012
Location: m
Posts: 76
Joshua Phelps is on a distinguished road
Default good change

they are better the new way. Good Change Ken
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)