Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Electric Basses > Woods, Electronics, & Components

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:32 AM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool DB Influences?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy Diza View Post
I totally agree. His basses are true classics and timeless. Since he made so many innovations in the past, I'm curious to see what coming up. I've had 3 Ken Smith basses in the past, and all of them were great.

Another thing I would add. Ken has 40+ years experience with the DB. A DB is 1,000 times more sensitive than an electric bass. Do you think Ken has drawn from and utilized that knowledge and experience with DB's into the design of his electric basses? I'm bettin he would say he has done just that. Oh, and keep in mind, some of these DB's date back as far as the late 1700's. That contribution is the major difference between Smith's and the Others.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:39 AM
Roy Diza's Avatar
Roy Diza Roy Diza is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-23-2007
Location: Northridge, CA
Posts: 56
Roy Diza is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Bishop View Post
Another thing I would add. Ken has 40+ years experience with the DB. A DB is 1,000 times more sensitive than an electric bass. Do you think Ken has drawn from and utilized that knowledge and experience with DB's into the design of his electric basses? I'm bettin he would say he has done just that. Oh, and keep in mind, some of these DB's date back as far as the late 1700's. That's a major difference between Smith's and the Others.

+1 on the DB thing. I can see alot of classic influences in his designs.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:16 PM
Bob Faulkner's Avatar
Bob Faulkner Bob Faulkner is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-22-2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 282
Bob Faulkner is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm kinda interested in knowing Ken's thoughts on string-thru-body designs and if he has considered it for his basses.
__________________
Proud original owner of a 2001 Ken Smith BSR4EG lined fretless.

My band's site:
Delusional Mind
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-16-2007, 03:39 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool String-thru Body Design.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Faulkner View Post
I'm kinda interested in knowing Ken's thoughts on string-thru-body designs and if he has considered it for his basses.


Hey Bob, I think Ken is in the middle of a PA Ice Storm today. He's probably thinking about anything but a "string-thru-body" design at this point.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-16-2007, 06:37 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,851
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb String thru?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Faulkner View Post
I'm kinda interested in knowing Ken's thoughts on string-thru-body designs and if he has considered it for his basses.
Why do you ask? Is there an advantage you think? Pros and cons? Theories and proven results?

I am happy with the resonance we get now from our Basses as well as the tone. I don't think an instrument of this level can be improved by drilling more holes in it and bending the String at 90% by the Bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-16-2007, 07:03 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool And there you have it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Smith View Post
Why do you ask? Is there an advantage you think? Pros and cons? Theories and proven results?

I am happy with the resonance we get now from our Basses as well as the tone. I don't think an instrument of this level can be improved by drilling more holes in it and bending the String at 90% by the Bridge.

And there you have it! Keep those question's and ideas comming!
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-19-2007, 10:21 AM
Bob Faulkner's Avatar
Bob Faulkner Bob Faulkner is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 01-22-2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 282
Bob Faulkner is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Smith View Post
Why do you ask? Is there an advantage you think? Pros and cons? Theories and proven results?

I am happy with the resonance we get now from our Basses as well as the tone. I don't think an instrument of this level can be improved by drilling more holes in it and bending the String at 90% by the Bridge.

Truthfully, in all my bass playing years, I've never played a string-thru-body bass so I was hoping to get some insight from someone with more knowledge about the good, bad, and ugly sides of it. Some people swear by it. I really have no clue about what effect there is, if any.
__________________
Proud original owner of a 2001 Ken Smith BSR4EG lined fretless.

My band's site:
Delusional Mind
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-19-2007, 02:41 PM
Steve_M Steve_M is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-23-2007
Location: moo
Posts: 109
Steve_M is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Faulkner View Post
Truthfully, in all my bass playing years, I've never played a string-thru-body bass so I was hoping to get some insight from someone with more knowledge about the good, bad, and ugly sides of it. Some people swear by it. I really have no clue about what effect there is, if any.
FWIW, I have two stingrays. One with through body stringing and one without and I'd challenge anyone to tell the difference with all other things being equal.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-19-2007, 04:17 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_M View Post
FWIW, I have two stingrays. One with through body stringing and one without and I'd challenge anyone to tell the difference with all other things being equal.
If that is a true statement (i.e. there is no difference), then what purpose would a thru-body serve?

I mean, "yes Mr. Bass Builder, I'd like to order that 5-String and yes, I would prefer to have the extra holes cut into the body because it looks cool and I love bending the strings 90 degrees at the bridge too".
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:08 PM
Ronson Hall's Avatar
Ronson Hall Ronson Hall is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 03-02-2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 120
Ronson Hall is on a distinguished road
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Bishop View Post
If that is a true statement (i.e. there is no difference), then what purpose would a thru-body serve?

I mean, "yes Mr. Bass Builder, I'd like to order that 5-String and yes, I would prefer to have the extra holes cut into the body because it looks cool and I love bending the strings 90 degrees at the bridge too".


I think that's what Steve's getting at, Tim. If there's "no difference" sonically that comes from bending the strings 90 degrees at the bridge, then why insist on doing it?
__________________
Ronson C. Hall
www.TrueLightSA.com
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-19-2007, 06:42 PM
Steve_M Steve_M is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-23-2007
Location: moo
Posts: 109
Steve_M is on a distinguished road
Default

I think the theory was that through body stringing was supposed to add sustain to a vibrating string by anchoring it in a heavy mass.

However, because the string doesn't actually vibrate between the break point over the saddle and the anchor, the method of anchoring (so long as its fit for purpose) doesn't have much of a tonal impact.

Its my understanding that how much mass the saddles have and the method by which the saddles are acoustically coupled (ie. in firm contact) with the bridge plate is much more important than anchoring. I guess the idea is to have a rigid structure (ie neck) and rigid, solid anchoring at the break points at either end of a string so that the vibrations of the string are mostly isolated.

Can Ken confirm I'm on the right track?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-19-2007, 07:04 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool I suspected as such...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronson Hall View Post
I think that's what Steve's getting at, Tim. If there's "no difference" sonically that comes from bending the strings 90 degrees at the bridge, then why insist on doing it?

I suspected that was what Steve was getting at, I just wanted to add my spin and a little more punch, I guess.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-19-2007, 07:07 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool Thanks Steve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_M View Post
I think the theory was that through body stringing was supposed to add sustain to a vibrating string by anchoring it in a heavy mass.

However, because the string doesn't actually vibrate between the break point over the saddle and the anchor, the method of anchoring (so long as its fit for purpose) doesn't have much of a tonal impact.

Its my understanding that how much mass the saddles have and the method by which the saddles are acoustically coupled (ie. in firm contact) with the bridge plate is much more important than anchoring. I guess the idea is to have a rigid structure (ie neck) and rigid, solid anchoring at the break points at either end of a string so that the vibrations of the string are mostly isolated.

Can Ken confirm I'm on the right track?

What you are saying above is correct. Hope you didn't take my response the wrong way. Just wanted to add my 2-cents worth!
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:59 PM
Ronson Hall's Avatar
Ronson Hall Ronson Hall is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 03-02-2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 120
Ronson Hall is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Bishop View Post
I suspected that was what Steve was getting at, I just wanted to add my spin and a little more punch, I guess.

Duly noted, Tim!
__________________
Ronson C. Hall
www.TrueLightSA.com
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-19-2007, 09:05 PM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool Duly noted.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronson Hall View Post
Duly noted, Tim!

I need to remember to respond carefully. Too much ambiguity in the eThread world.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-19-2007, 11:16 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,851
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb right track?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_M View Post
I think the theory was that through body stringing was supposed to add sustain to a vibrating string by anchoring it in a heavy mass.

However, because the string doesn't actually vibrate between the break point over the saddle and the anchor, the method of anchoring (so long as its fit for purpose) doesn't have much of a tonal impact.

Its my understanding that how much mass the saddles have and the method by which the saddles are acoustically coupled (ie. in firm contact) with the bridge plate is much more important than anchoring. I guess the idea is to have a rigid structure (ie neck) and rigid, solid anchoring at the break points at either end of a string so that the vibrations of the string are mostly isolated.

Can Ken confirm I'm on the right track?

Hey, if I keep reading this stuff I might mess up what took me 30 years to get done..

Actually, most Basses with 3 feet of Paint as a finish needs all the help it can get to vibrate the wood buried down under somewhere. Stringing thru the body was thought by some to make the wood vibrate more. If our Bass or any other vibrates too much, the sound would be like 'mush' without definition. Think of all those old P Basses used in the 60s with ZERO sustain that sounded so good on recordings. Are we playing whole notes held out for 5 minutes at a time between notes? How much vibration do we need?

Hit a note on any Bass you have and grab the headstock. Then feel the back below the bridge. You will see that even if it's made or Rock, it will vibrate to some degree. Even a half assed bass has vibration throughout. It's just, what are you vibrating?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-20-2007, 12:30 AM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool I might mess up....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Smith View Post
Hey, if I keep reading this stuff I might mess up what took me 30 years to get done..

Actually, most Basses with 3 feet of Paint as a finish needs all the help it can get to vibrate the wood buried down under somewhere. Stringing thru the body was thought by some to make the wood vibrate more. If our Bass or any other vibrates too much, the sound would be like 'mush' without definition. Think of all those old P Basses used in the 60s with ZERO sustain that sounded so good on recordings. Are we playing whole notes held out for 5 minutes at a time between notes? How much vibration do we need?

Hit a note on any Bass you have and grab the headstock. Then feel the back below the bridge. You will see that even if it's made or Rock, it will vibrate to some degree. Even a half assed bass has vibration throughout. It's just, what are you vibrating?

Please stop reading then, we don't want you to get messed up.

Interesting Ken. This is good stuff. Great ****ogy on the "old P Basses" and everything following.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-20-2007, 03:52 AM
Steve_M Steve_M is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-23-2007
Location: moo
Posts: 109
Steve_M is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Smith View Post
Stringing thru the body was thought by some to make the wood vibrate more.
So I was walking on the right path but just in the wrong direction?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-21-2007, 09:41 AM
Tim Bishop's Avatar
Tim Bishop Tim Bishop is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-25-2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,274
Tim Bishop is on a distinguished road
Cool The right path......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve_M View Post
So I was walking on the right path but just in the wrong direction?


Steve, the main thing is that we realize we are never too old or to smart to learn.
__________________
Tim Bishop

Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-25-2007, 06:03 AM
Steve_M Steve_M is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-23-2007
Location: moo
Posts: 109
Steve_M is on a distinguished road
Default

Indeed.

We're lucky on bassworld.co.uk in having a forum specifically set up for budding luthiers. I tried a bass at our Bassworld Bash last weekend that was built by one of our contributors. I wasn't keen on the body shape but I was blown away by the sound - especially considering that the guy had built it in his garage.

The neck was a combination of flamed maple and had two stringers of wenge running down either side with graphite reinforcement. It sounded crisp, warm, deep and growly. I was wondering if Ken's every experimented with wenge in the neck of a prototype Smith?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)