|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Walnut/Maple vs. Maple/Walnut
It seems like currently the two most popular wood combinations are a walnut core with maple top/back and a maple core with walnut top/back.
In respect to the neck thru basses, what would the tone differences be between the two? And which contributes more to the tone, the core or the top/back (on the neck thru basses)? Thanks. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
woods..
Quote:
In my experience, the Maple top woods have a tighter, higher treble, less mids and more bottom spread than with a Walnut top which has more mids, wider treble presence and clearer bass tone, easier to EQ. So, the Walnut core brightens up the maple top and the maple core helps to spread the walnut tone in the bottom. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
To over simplify, it almost sounds like the two combinations work towards the same tone goals with the maple top emphasizing the highs/lows and the walnut top emphasizing the mids.
So I've recently taken delivery of a 1996 CR6G with quilted Maple top and back, Mahogany core and Bubinga fretboard. How does that compare to the two basses you've described? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
??
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Before the internet, everybody evaluated basses with their ears. Now, it's all with the eyes. I can tell more about a bass playing it for a few minutes than reading descriptions for hours.
Are the basses on your web site that are designated in stock available to try out at your shop? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
stock..
Quote:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|