|
|
#13
12-23-2009, 07:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
humm..
From a structural standpoint I can see why Arnold prefers the 'new Back' route. For 'vintage' reasons, I prefer a high grade restoration. Flatbacks repaired or 'new' can have problems by design vs. climate alone. I would rather maintain an old repaired back than wait for a new one to implode. I have seen Flatback failures in both new and old so my vote is to keep the bass as original as possible.
__________________
Ken Smith ~ http://www.kensmithbasses.com http://www.kensmithbasses.com/doublebasses/ http://www.facebook.com/KenSmithBasses https://www.instagram.com/kensmithbasses/ https://www.facebook.com/ken.smith.904750 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode