Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Double Basses > Music [DB] > Classical and Symphony Bass Playing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2008, 10:38 PM
Matthew Heintz Matthew Heintz is offline
Junior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 12-22-2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 20
Matthew Heintz is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you, Arnold. Keep us posted.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2009, 05:07 AM
Joel Larsson Joel Larsson is offline
Senior Posting Member
 
Join Date: 02-10-2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 67
Joel Larsson is on a distinguished road
Default

I wouldn't say that five stringers are standard. I think it's very common, at least in Swedish orchestras, to play standard four-stringers (although most have a C-extension these days) and maybe have some fivers thrown in in lack of more extendeds, for good measure, or because some things are simply easier to play on a fiver. A problem for all individuals and most orchestras is that a fiver equivalent to a good 4 is a lot more expensive, this probably being a result of the general problems that comes with a high pressure, and the bigger overall size. A 5er that feels and plays like a 4-string is simply rare. We have a 70's Pöllmann 5-string at school which is now poorly set up by some luthier who obviously was better with violins; it's huge, it makes you hurt, but I still think it'd sell at a rather high price. The value of a brand new five stringer therefore usually better matches the invested amount than a 4-string.

A Rubner 5-string I played once was unusually good (both for being a Rubner and being a hi low-to-mid class bass) but its bass bar was too weak, and the top was sagging in a way which seemed to imply that it would be around much longer.

I believe many people with high end basses, who wants to be able to use them also for the pieces that requires a fifth string, prefer to put on an extension over having it converted to 5 strings. The small hole drilled in the scroll is less molesting to the bass and its history than having it converted properly, plus, many players have expressed gratification of the way their basses seems to have "opened up" with the extended E, while an added B-string is unlikely to improve the tonal qualities, even on basses that were absolute high end from the beginning.

Arnold is completely right that the required arch of the bridge and FB may surprise anyone. Ergonomical issues, and problems with hitting the top or corners with the bow, may arise as the G gets far away from you. I usually like playing them, though, as long as they are decently set up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)