![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My non-scientific belief is that overly large f-holes are not good for tone. I will try to explain, based on a lengthy conversation I had about a decade ago with Tom Martin. We think that when the f-holes of a bass are really big, the sound jumps out of the bass quickly, creating the illusion of power. But when the f-holes are sized right, the sound has more time to roll around inside the corpus and it gets seasoned. Then the tone is more complex and woody, but the bass may not sound quite as loud in the immediate surrounding area. However, it will spread out into the hall and the audience will get more bass sound. Now this begs the question, "what is the right size?". My answer is, I know it when I see it. I think many of the Italian and English masters had it right, i.e., Panormo, the Testores, Ruggieri, etc. Contrarily, to my eye many of the Germans, Viennese, and some of the Americans make/made their f-holes overly large and open. And I have also had experience where very small f-holes seem to be holding back the power of a bass. I had the experience of enlarging them on a fine bass once, and I thought the instrument's power improved. Then again, other modifications were made, so I can't be sure.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I always go for sound and volume before all else especially in chamber music where I am all alone and do not need to blend and my primary objective.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Italians used proprotional geometry to place the f holes, Might that have a lot to do with them looking and sounding right?
Structuraly there is a lot going on in this area. The flexiblility of the plate in this area is highly effected by the placement of the f holes and their spacing, length, width of wings, slope and area. Arching, thickness and edge scoop also highly effect the structure of the top plate in this area. The bridge sits right in the middle and transmits the string movement directly to the top, right in the middle of the f holes. Theres a lot going on here! Viols had C holes with a similar area as f holes. But the C holes covered much less horizontal grain so the plate was stiffer in that area. F holes evolved to create the more violin like sound that is now favored in larger concert halls. So that is why I think f holes effect the sound a lot but not by air movement. The air pumping out of the box through the f holes creates a fullness to the sound. And I have noticed even cheap plywood basses have that whoomph, air sound. But the complex tone from a good bass comes from resonating of the bass body. I just don't think the f hole size effects tone much by itself, unless they are too small or large. I am going to do some tests later this week. edit: By allowing or not allowing air to pump, I should have said. Last edited by Ken McKay; 01-12-2009 at 02:06 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How does f-hole placement effect the sound?
If the f-hole is moved closer to the center of the bass, is the sound deeper with more bass response? Or does the bass have a more treble response if the f-holes are moved closer to the outer ribs? This is just a theory; still looking for evidence. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This does not mean you should place f-holes all the way to the edges, because your tonal balance will suffer. The f-hole upper holes should be spaced the same distance apart as the size of bridge you wish to use. What, design the instrument from the set-up backwards? Exactly. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks to all for input. Keep 'em coming.
martin |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Exactly what I did when designing our bass!
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|