![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Similar but not as thick sounding as the maple core would be.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
THX VERY MUCH, maybe maple is my first choice
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
There are other choices and I don't think you'll be disappointed.
![]()
__________________
Tim Bishop |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Remember, You can't hold no groove if you ain't got no pocket!
Last edited by Tim Murphy; 12-01-2009 at 11:02 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Being that the sound comes mainly from the Top in my experience and the core flavors the Top's sound I would have to say it would add a little edge that the Walnut usually has rather than adding spread which the Maple would do.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks Ken, So, would you say the W/W/W would be a more "aggressive" toned bass than the W/M/W? Mainly I play Urban Gospel and Smooth Jazz.
__________________
Remember, You can't hold no groove if you ain't got no pocket!
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would say so but the difference is subtle.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|