![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So the three differences are; 1-Circuit 2-Finish 3-Neck feature wood |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Here's John's bass and link from his Forum post. He includes a pics link of his 5GN:
http://www.smithbassforums.com/showthread.php?t=1298
__________________
Tim Bishop |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() All is still different that I mentioned. 1991 was the BT/old Laq and 2001 was the GN/Oil Varnish. New models are upgraded.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Have you made any size changes over the years in relation to neck width? For example, would a new BT6 neck have the same dimensions as an 1990 or older BT6? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
As far as depth measurements go this can and has changed from time to time as well as bass to bass. These basses are all hand carved. The machines only cut away the bulk of the material. Then they are carved, shaped and sanded by hand. No two basses come out exactly alike. In my opinion, I feel that the current basses we make at any given time are always the best they have been. Why do any less, ever? |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|