![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another consideration: Some woods are heavier than others too. Personally, I don't have a problem with the weight of any Smith I've ever owned.
![]()
__________________
Tim Bishop |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi All,
In fact I like the fretted Smith basses as they are and I am pretty sure there will not be so many changes in the future, as this design showed at what level the basses are excelent made and thought. Nevertheless, my thoughts are in the fretless area. I wish it would exist a specific fretless design/model with the following features/options: - only one sweetspoted pickup - option for a piezzo pickup considering the exceptional sound the Smith basses deliver. - longer fingerboard (joining the sweetspoted pickup or at least 28 fretlines) so no need for a neck ramp. - chambered body in order to achive more acoustic headroom.(especially usefull with the piezzo pickup) Am I dreaming too much? Best regards |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know if this has already been mentioned before but I would like to see an option for a shorter headstock on 7 string Smith basses. I played a six string Smith for many years and now with the 7 string I have to be much more careful not to knock people in the head when playing music in tight quarters. I'm getting more used to it but it would still be nice to have a headstock which is closer to the same length as a six string if it is possible.
I've imagined that perhaps 3 tuners on the top in normal spacing with 4 on the bottom using a very tight spacing, probably almost touching tight, could possibly work and come out to about the same distance as the 3 top normally spaced tuners. Perhaps the F string tuner would need to be slightly closer to the nut than the B sting to achieve the equal distance at the A and D string tuners. I'm not sure about the details but if this could be done it could lesson the length by around 2.5 inches which may not seem like a lot but again when playing in tight corners going from about 8.5 inches to 6 inches of headstock length would be nice. I've even imagined a couple of ways of modifying my own bass to achieve this but then I regained my sanity and thought better than to even think about going down that road. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I wasn't really thinking a smaller head, just the length of it so I think the distance to the edge might be able to stay the same but strength certainly would trump a couple and a half inches of length in the headstock so if drilling the tuning machine holes closer to each other would make it weaker then it certainly would not be worth it. And, like you said, basses get bumped all the time so again strength wins out. I've dealt with basses in the past that had very close tuning machines and it didn't bother me but I can see how a lot of people would probably not like that. Thanks again for your reply and your time! By the way, thank you for making such fantastic instruments! I hope you have time to get out and play some golf. Brian |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I almost had the problem with the headstock - but the problem was really the other musician standing too close to me.
Last night, the guitarist kept standing too close - so I put the headstock about one-inch from his nose. He stepped back. No problems with my Smith7-string bass. None.
__________________
-- Christopher Rhodes www.crjazz.com chris-rhodes@comcast.net http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtLy4wtJy4k |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|