![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, perhaps I should have said healthy, not excellent. Here are a few pictures that I received. Sorry if it is not enough, but it is all I have. Should get a chance to play it at the end of the month while visiting the East Coast.
Last edited by Nathan Levine; 06-06-2011 at 01:20 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
here is a classic case of anything possible Yankee being called a Prescott. I don't agree was the attribution at all, sorry. I don't know who made that but there might be a dealer or two in the northeast that has seen a dozen or so makers Church basses and can ID but another they know that is identical or close. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Too bad. Thanks for your expertise regarding this instrument.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have seen many non-Prescott instruments called Prescott. Regardless, Prescott was not in the class of the fine European makers at all. He did however produce the most basses (200?) and Cello/Church Basses (500?) of any other 19th century Yankee maker. He had plenty of help. Also, I have seen many mis-attributed Prescott basses that were in my opinion as good or better. Fame/pedigree brings more money than sound in the vintage world but in the price range of Yankee basses, I would go for the sound first.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 17 (0 members and 17 guests) | |
|
|