Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB)

Go Back   Ken's Corner (Bass Forums Sponsored By KSB) > Electric Basses > Smith Basses, Handmade

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2011, 04:07 PM
Ken Smith's Avatar
Ken Smith Ken Smith is offline
Bassist, Luthier & Admin
 
Join Date: 01-18-2007
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 4,864
Ken Smith is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb yes..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Albano View Post
Thank you for the links, I will go through them for sure.
So the center block determines size or overall width, which is obvious now that you say it
... So both the BO's and NT's are basically the same size.
I am looking at both body styles (NT) And I thought I read somewhere that the vintage body has a wider bottom as opposed to the longer horn on the BSR's.
- T
The BT/CR Vintage body Wings are slighter wider but with a shorter upper horn while the the BSR wings are slightly narrower and has a longer upper horn. The basic overall mass is about the same between the two so it's mainly the proportions of where the wood is placed are rather cut/shaped to.

For sitting (and I just played a show last night) the BT shape is more comfortable for most. For standing depending on you you hold and play the bass, it's a split some decision. Some say they can't balance the BT vintage style body but those that rest their arm on the body in a more traditional fashion and non-guitar style hold, LOVE the older BT model.

I can use and live with either but do not prefer the BRS over the BT for balancing the way I play. What feels good to 'you' is between you and your playing style.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2011, 08:04 PM
Tom Albano Tom Albano is offline
Posting Member
 
Join Date: 10-30-2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 60
Tom Albano is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Tom Albano
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Smith View Post
The BT/CR Vintage body Wings are slighter wider but with a shorter upper horn while the the BSR wings are slightly narrower and has a longer upper horn. The basic overall mass is about the same between the two so it's mainly the proportions of where the wood is placed are rather cut/shaped to.

For sitting (and I just played a show last night) the BT shape is more comfortable for most. For standing depending on you you hold and play the bass, it's a split some decision. Some say they can't balance the BT vintage style body but those that rest their arm on the body in a more traditional fashion and non-guitar style hold, LOVE the older BT model.

I can use and live with either but do not prefer the BRS over the BT for balancing the way I play. What feels good to 'you' is between you and your playing style.
There definitely seems to be more BSR than BT out there, I love the BT shape also, right now I have 2 basses Im looking at... on my short list on is a Black Tiger BT (Walnut Top, Figured Maple Core, Walnut Back)
The other is an amazing EG (Quilted Maple & Back/Figured Maple Accent Laminates/Mahogany Core, 5-Piece Maple/Morado Neck)
Both basses are at Bass Central (at least I think they are in stock I havent even gotten that far yet)
Ill ask about tonal qualities in another thread I guess
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 - Ken Smith Basses, LTD. (All Rights Reserved)