![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I would also reduce the use of flash on your pictures - it produces that annoying glare that prevents us from seeing your basses' true patina. I like your older pictures because they didn't use flash.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Also, those that are interested in buying basses like this come by and play them. Our product is not an on-line picture book so this is the first complaint I have heard on the flash. Some of the basses with round-backs or shiny varnish are hard to capture without glare in spots, even without the flash. The pictures are just basic examples of what they look like. You really have to play them to get the full value of the bass. I would say pics, 2%, playing, 98%.. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Having visited Ken's shop, played, and listened to Ken play, several of his basses I would say that the photos capture more like .001% of his collection's magic...
Definitely worth a trip. It is sort of the opposite of some things, where the marketing "buzz" and the photos are the best part... Last edited by Eric Swanson; 07-04-2011 at 09:13 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Maybe in a day or so we will get the page up and published. We still have to do the Scroll thumbnail on the price tier page. It will be in the upper range page of the basses opposite the William Tarr Bass which we shot yesterday as well. I still have some page work to do on the Tarr so we will load them both together. So, pics are coming so be patient. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Here's the Link to the new Claudot page;
http://www.kensmithbasses.com/doublebasses/claudot/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() That is just lovely. I like the look of the back angle; it looks as if it would help getting into the upper register.
It really is in amazingly fine condition. Thank you very much for sharing these photos! What a beautiful bass... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ken,
perhaps he made some Vuillaume-like instruments too? This one has the Claudot stamp on the back, inside. It is big, I didn't take body measurements, but the string length is a bit less than cm 112, despite the short neck graft (so short that I had to make an opposite extended nut) It was a three stringer |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|